2013年--外文翻译--对外汉语学习者通过语义和语音进行汉字解码的新兴发展（节选）

《2013年--外文翻译--对外汉语学习者通过语义和语音进行汉字解码的新兴发展（节选）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2013年--外文翻译--对外汉语学习者通过语义和语音进行汉字解码的新兴发展（节选）（5页珍藏版）》请在毕设资料网上搜索。

1、 1358单词， 7800英文字符 ,2044字 出处： Williams C. Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learnersJ. Reading and Writing, 2013, 26(2):293-315. Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a

2、 foreign language learners Clay Williams Reading in Chinese Processing Chinese: a dual route model The Chinese character system lends itself well to the study of reading processes. As Chinese employs a complex set of characterseach representing both a meaning and a soundthis both suggests that readi

3、ng in Chinese would require a different set of processes than when reading alphabetic (or phonetically transcribed) languages, and also presents interesting opportunities for the further study of general reading models. A general agreement exists among most theorists that at least two processes are

4、involved in reading (e.g., Coltheart, 1978): reading via the semantic representation of the word, and via a non-lexical procedure of grapheme- phoneme conversion (Bi, Han, Weekes, & Shu, 2007). This has been conceptualized in terms of what has become known as the dual route model or standard model (

5、Patterson & Morton, 1985). In principle, this can be summarized as two co-existing, parallel lexical access pathways, one of which retrieves words via pronunciation (the phonological route), and the other retrieves whole words from the mental lexicon (the lexical route). This latter route has often

6、been characterized as a semantic route to lexical access. Various studies have supported the existence of both pathways to word recognition. The fact that readers (of alphabetic scripts) can pronounce nonsense words, such as “wug,” clearly indicates the existence of a phonological route to word identification (i.e., independent of meaning); and semantic priming studies, as well as studies with deep dyslexic subjects (who produce semantic substitutions in reading) suggest a semantic