2011年外文翻译--理解中国银行业的高盈利能力（节选）

《2011年外文翻译--理解中国银行业的高盈利能力（节选）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2011年外文翻译--理解中国银行业的高盈利能力（节选）（11页珍藏版）》请在毕设资料网上搜索。

1、2800 英文单词， 15500 英文字符， 4500 汉字 文献出处： Lchel H, Li H X. Understanding the high profitability of Chinese banksJ. Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series, 2011. Understanding the high profitability of Chinese banks Lchel, Horst; Li, Helena Xiang Abstract The big Chinese state-owned banks came as winners

2、 out of the global financial crisis. According to the Banker ranking, Chinese banks led the global banking profitability ranking through the years from 2008 to 2010 and contributed one fifth of global banking profits in 2010. The Chinese banking sector, which was deemed as wholly insolvent ten years

3、 ago, was reborn like a phoenix from the fire of the Asian financial crisis and the current financial crisis. The banking reform in the last decade with large-scale capital injection, assets carve-outs, restructuring and public listing celebrated great success. However, the low efficiency in Chinese

4、 banks is still persistent, as evident in many empirical studies (e.g. Feyziolu, (2009). The contradiction of high profitability and low efficiency causes great confusion in understanding banking in China. Our paper aims to reveal the real sources of the high profitability of the big Chinese banks.

5、We compare their profitability pattern with peer banks from Asia, Europe and North America. We first test the hypothesis that the average asset return of the “big five” Chinese banks will fall below the international comparative level if the current high net interest margin given by the managed inte

6、rest system in China falls to the international peer average level. Surprisingly, the hypothesis has to be rejected. Instead, our results show that the profitability of Chinese banks stays at international comparative level, despite the high inefficiency in Chinese banks. We therefore test a second hypothesis stating that the profitability of Chinese banks will fall- below their international peers if staff costs increase by 30 percent in average to reach the international level, with the