【精品文档】232关于TBT技术性贸易壁垒有关 的外文文献翻译成品：技术性贸易壁垒是促进还是限制贸易？来自中国的证据（中英文双语对照）1

《【精品文档】232关于TBT技术性贸易壁垒有关 的外文文献翻译成品：技术性贸易壁垒是促进还是限制贸易？来自中国的证据（中英文双语对照）1》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《【精品文档】232关于TBT技术性贸易壁垒有关 的外文文献翻译成品：技术性贸易壁垒是促进还是限制贸易？来自中国的证据（中英文双语对照）1（29页珍藏版）》请在毕设资料网上搜索。

1、此文档是毕业设计外文翻译成品（ 含英文原文+中文翻译） ，无需调整复杂的格 式！下载之后直接可用，方便快捷！本文价格不贵,也就几十块钱！一辈子也就 一次的事！ 外文标题：Do Technical Barriers to Trade Promote or Restrict Trade? Evidence from China 外文作者：Xiaohua Baoa and Larry D. Qiu 文 献 出 处 :Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(3) December 2018 (如觉得年份太老，可改为近 2 年，毕竟很多毕业

2、生 都这样做) 英文 6801 单词，42876 字符(字符就是印刷符)，中文 10486 汉字。 Do Technical Barriers to Trade Promote or Restrict Trade? Evidence from China Abstract：The use of technical barriers to trade (TBT) is widespread and has increasing impact on international trade. In contrast to most other trade measures, TBT have bot

3、h trade promotion and trade restriction effects. Due to their theoretical complexity and their scarcity, TBT have been considered as one of the most difficult non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to quantify. In this paper, we construct a TBT database from 1998-2006 to examine the influence of TBT imposed by

4、China on the countrys imports. When using the frequency index, we find that TBT are trade restrictive: a one unit increase in TBT will decrease import value by about 0.8%. However, when the coverage ratio is used, we find that the negative effects of TBT are not statistically significant based on the entire period. However, if the focus is shifted to data from 1998-2001, we find that TBT have trade promotion effects. A one unit increase in TBT will increase import value by about 0.2%. Finally