欢迎来到毕设资料网! | 帮助中心 毕设资料交流与分享平台
毕设资料网
全部分类
  • 毕业设计>
  • 毕业论文>
  • 外文翻译>
  • 课程设计>
  • 实习报告>
  • 相关资料>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 毕设资料网 > 资源分类 > DOC文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    高等教育的财政外文翻译

    • 资源ID:138160       资源大小:48KB        全文页数:11页
    • 资源格式: DOC        下载积分:100金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    三方登录下载: QQ登录
    下载资源需要100金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。

    高等教育的财政外文翻译

    1、2075 单词, 3485 汉字 出处 : Arthur M. Hauptman, 2006.“Higher Education Finance: Trends and Issues”. Springer International Hand books of Education, Volume 18.pp.83-106. Higher Education Finance Public and Private Support of Institutions Higher education systems around the world depend on a combination of

    2、public and private resources to fund their operations. There is a great deal of variation among countries in the proportion of public and private resources they consume. In the majority of countries, institutions are primarily financed through public resources in the form of government support; tuit

    3、ion fees and other private sources of support are low or nonexistent. At the other end of the spectrum are countries such as the United States where private resources constitute as much as half or more of the total resources devoted to higher education. Public Sources of Support In most countries, p

    4、ublic sources of support represent by far the largest resource for higher education institutions. The way in which these public funds are distributed and the signals that these funds provide to institutional officials are critical in defining the financing structure of the country. There are a numbe

    5、r of issues that help to characterize public support of higher education, including: how research activities, recurrent operating expenses (running costs), and capital expenses are financed; funding governance issues including who is responsible for distributing funds; accountability models; and tax

    6、-based support. How are capital improvements financed? Capital improvements in higher education the construction and renovation of facilities and the acquisition of large equipment tend to be financed in one of several ways. A number of countries pay for capital expenses through the same public fund

    7、ing mechanisms that pay for instruction, operations, and possibly research. But in many other cases, capital expenses are paid for through private sources, either the issuance of bonds in which repayment often comes from dedicated revenues that relate to the capital expense, or through donations and

    8、 endowments in countries where private giving is a source of funds. Facilities also might be paid for through tuition fees, often a major source of financing for capital expenses. As a general matter, it is better if capital expenditures are not financed through the same mechanism as instruction and

    9、 operations, as short-terms needs for operating funds often squeeze out legitimate longer term needs for improvement. Improving Coordination Among Funding, Fee, and Financial Aid Policies. A fundamental weakness in the higher education financing approach employed in most countries is the inadequate

    10、degree of coordination among the three key elements of financingthe funding of institutions, the setting of tuition fees, and the provision of student financial aid (Hauptman, 1998). Among the many challenges in coordinating, three are most prominent. First, policymakers in every country should cons

    11、ider whether government funding of institutions and tuition fees should be uniform across institutions or differentiated. To put this question into context, one must first recognize that public universities around the world have two major sources of revenuespublic funding support and the tuition fee

    12、s which students and their families pay. These two revenue sources can vary by institution or they can be equalized. The best policy, in this authors opinion, is one in which one of these revenue sources is differentiated among institutions and the other is not, for the following reason. If both fee

    13、s and public funding are differentiated by institution, the best funded universities will get richer while those with the least resources will fall further behind as the gap between them grows. On the other hand, in systems where both fees and funding are equalizing forces fees are kept the same acr

    14、oss institutions, while public funds are distributed in an equal manner quality is likely to be compromised because high quality institutions are unlikely to emerge in such a funding scheme. It is much better if one of these sources is differential and the other is an equalizing force. In the opinio

    15、n of this author, it is better for government funding to be uniform across institutions in part because it is difficult for governments to pick winners and for tuition fees to be differentiated, thus providing a measure of quality. A second issue involving the relationship between fees and funding i

    16、s what happens to government support in response to changes in tuition fees. The question is, when fees are increased, what happens to the government support those institutions receive? If there is no reduction in public support, institutions have little reason not to increase their fees. On the oth

    17、er hand, if government funds are reduced one-for-one with any increase in fees, then the institution will have little incentive to raise fees because the other major form of support will be correspondingly reduced. The appropriate policy is somewhere in between, with public funding reduced to reflec

    18、t increases in fee revenues but not as much as the increase in fees. A third challenge of coordination involves the relationship between fees and financial aid when fees are increased. Most countries seeking to raise tuition fees in relative terms have not adequately recognized the need to increase

    19、student aid to protect against the adverse effects of increasing fees for students and families that cannot afford those increases. Concerns about this nexus of higher fees and more financial aid center on three issues. First, loans are relied upon much more than grants as a means to pay for fee inc

    20、reases. Second, the aid provided, whether in the form of loans or grants, is generally insufficient to meet the increased financial need created by higher fees. Third, typically fee increases are put in place before an adequate student financial aid system has been put into operation, thereby creati

    21、ng a new and growing class of needy students and feeding student fears that aid will not be there to offset the effects of higher fees. Private Sources of Funds to Institutions Colleges and universities around the world depend on a variety of private sources of funds to help support their recurrent

    22、operations and fund their capital improvements. These private sources of revenues include tuition fees; gifts and other forms of philanthropy; payments from a variety of services; and the commercialization of research conducted on campus and for the support of other private entrepreneurial enterprises. Tuition fees Tuition fees in most countries represent the largest private source of revenues for


    注意事项

    本文(高等教育的财政外文翻译)为本站会员(译***)主动上传,毕设资料网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请联系网站客服QQ:540560583,我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们
    本站所有资料均属于原创者所有,仅提供参考和学习交流之用,请勿用做其他用途,转载必究!如有侵犯您的权利请联系本站,一经查实我们会立即删除相关内容!
    copyright@ 2008-2025 毕设资料网所有
    联系QQ:540560583