欢迎来到毕设资料网! | 帮助中心 毕设资料交流与分享平台
毕设资料网
全部分类
  • 毕业设计>
  • 毕业论文>
  • 外文翻译>
  • 课程设计>
  • 实习报告>
  • 相关资料>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 毕设资料网 > 资源分类 > DOC文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    内部审计的蜕变外文翻译

    • 资源ID:138059       资源大小:51.50KB        全文页数:11页
    • 资源格式: DOC        下载积分:100金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    三方登录下载: QQ登录
    下载资源需要100金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。

    内部审计的蜕变外文翻译

    1、1 1930 单词, 3450 汉字 本科毕业 论文 ( 设计 ) 外 文 翻 译 外文题目 Michael.Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit 外文出处 Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 外文 作者 Laura F. Spira / Michael Page 原文 : THE METAMORPHOSIS OF INTERNAL AUDIT In this section we trace

    2、 the development of internal audit and compare the rhetoric of the associations seeking to professionalise the activity with the changes which are occurring in the work of internal auditors as a result of external pressures and the opportunity to expand their remit which the redefinition of internal

    3、 control affords. Historically, internal audit has been viewed as a monitoring function, the organizational policeman and watchdog (Morgan, 1979, p.161), tolerated as a necessary component of organizational control but deemed subservient to the achievement of major corporate objectives. An examinati

    4、on of the pressures on internal audit in recent years reveals the structure to demonstrate that the function can add value. Outsourcing of the internal audit function became popular during the 1980s as the costs of internal audit were being closely scrutinized in many companies, often as a result of

    5、 the application of business process re-engineering techniques. The move to outsourcing was one of the driving forces for change in internal audit. The large accounting firms saw opportunities for new business. Bruce (1996) suested that a risk management approach to strategy by top management and a

    6、desire to view it in an integrated way was an impetus towards integration of external and internal audit, 2 but the need for independence of external auditors provided a countervailing pressure. The response of the internal audit community has been to emphasise professionalism and the potential of i

    7、nternal audit to add value.Kalbers and Fogarty (1995) observed that discussions about professionalism have exercised internal auditors for many years. In 1979, Morgan identified the aspiration of internal auditors to move from controller to controller-adviser as part of the process of professionalis

    8、ation of internal audit, noting that this shift can only be successfully achieved at the cost of surrendering certain elements of the controllership role, and some of the claims to formal authority which go along with it. (Morgan 1979, p.168) He observed that internal auditors found it problematic t

    9、o relinquish such claims, and cited difficulties encountered when internal auditors, having attempted to establish a co-operative relationship with auditees, were obliged to resort to formal authority to obtain access to information or to deal with problems revealed by audit. He noted that: .recent

    10、IIA pronouncements which emphasise how internal audit should provide a “service to the organisation” and how internal auditors should become more accountable to Audit Committees of Boards of Directors and society, rather than exclusively to managementsignal the definition of a role and power base wh

    11、ich returns to the philosophy of the original audit rolebut which carries with it an expanded conception of the audit function whichseeks to combine control and advisory functions, by orienting the latter to the highest organisational levels. (Morgan 1979, pp. 169-70) Twenty years after Morgans obse

    12、rvations, the Institute of Internal Auditors promulgated a new definition of internal auditing which focuses on independence and objectivity, identifying an assurance and consulting role for internal audit and emphasizing adding value and improving effectiveness of risk management, control and gover

    13、nance processes. Krogstad etal. (1999, p.33) outlined the development of this new definition and noted that internal auditings interface with governance raises the stakes for the profession. 3 Although this new interest in the potential of internal audit to contribute positively to corporate objecti

    14、ves offers an opportunity for a stronger claim to professional status, difficulties remain. Pentland (2000), seeking to establish the boundaries of audit, observed that auditors are experts in process rather than content: in areas such as environmental audit, specialists from other disciplines offer

    15、 strong competition to the expert status of the traditional internal auditor. Similar challenges are encountered in the area of risk management and may be rebutted by the assertion that internal audit has the advantage of independence (ICAEW 2000, p.9) but the tension remains between the consultancy

    16、 role of internal audit and claims of independent status. Fogarty and Kalbers (2000) explored a range of dimensions of professionalisation in internal audit, identifying independence, autonomy and self-regulation as key attributes, but cautioning that .organisations should also be aware that interna

    17、l auditing inherently involves role conflict. Efforts to eliminate role conflict may deny internal auditors the very essence of their roles in the organisations.(p.134). Claims for professional status both support and are supported by the identification of areas in which professional expertise may b

    18、e demonstrated. The financial scandals which provoked world-wide concern with corporate governance in the 1990s highlighted apparent failures of accountability 9. Inevitably audit and internal control, mechanisms designed to secure accountability, became a focus for the debate about reform. Internal

    19、 auditors, traditionally specialists in internal control but not highly regarded within organisations, have attracted the attention of boards grappling with external demands for assurance about corporate governance practice. Thus Turnbulls broader approach to internal control has offered internal au

    20、dit the opportunity to claim expertise in the crucial area of risk management. The power base of internal audit is firmly established: it is a key component of good corporate governance practice. But to what extent has the opportunity identified for extending this advantage been exploited by internal auditors? There is a consensus that important changes are occurring in the nature of


    注意事项

    本文(内部审计的蜕变外文翻译)为本站会员(译***)主动上传,毕设资料网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请联系网站客服QQ:540560583,我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们
    本站所有资料均属于原创者所有,仅提供参考和学习交流之用,请勿用做其他用途,转载必究!如有侵犯您的权利请联系本站,一经查实我们会立即删除相关内容!
    copyright@ 2008-2025 毕设资料网所有
    联系QQ:540560583