欢迎来到毕设资料网! | 帮助中心 毕设资料交流与分享平台
毕设资料网
全部分类
  • 毕业设计>
  • 毕业论文>
  • 外文翻译>
  • 课程设计>
  • 实习报告>
  • 相关资料>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 毕设资料网 > 资源分类 > DOC文档下载
    分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

    外文翻译---企业社会责任,股权结构和政治干预:来自中国的证据

    • 资源ID:135774       资源大小:81.50KB        全文页数:14页
    • 资源格式: DOC        下载积分:100金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    账号登录下载
    三方登录下载: QQ登录
    下载资源需要100金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。

    外文翻译---企业社会责任,股权结构和政治干预:来自中国的证据

    1、PDF外文:http:/ 中文 4490 字  本科毕业 论文 ( 设计 )  外   文   翻   译  外文题目     Corporate Social Responsibility, OwnershipStructure,  and Political Interference: Evidence from China                          

    2、;                                 外文出处       Journal of Business Ethics  2010( 96): P631-645                               &n

    3、bsp;                  外文 作者                  Wenjing Li  Ran Zhang                                        

    4、;                             原文 :  Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China Introduction  In recent years, there has been growing awareness of the role of cor

    5、porations in society in an international setting. Among the unresolved issues that deserve attention, Aguilera et al. (2007, p. 837) postulate that an important question in corporate social responsibility (CSR) requiring further attention is what catalyzes organizations to engage in increasingly rob

    6、ust CSR initiatives. Prior research studies (Chapple and Moon, 2005; Deniz-Deniz and Garcia-Falcon, 2002; Graves and Waddock, 1994; Johnson and Greening, 1999; Muller and Kolk, 2010; Roberts, 1992; Stanwick and Stanwick, 1998; Zu and Song, 2009) document a link among CSR and rm size, protability, co

    7、rporate governance, leverage, employees, industry, and environmental pressures, e.g., shareholder demands, regulation, or media pressure. Among those studies, Graves and Waddock (1994) and Johnson and Greening (1999) document a relationship between rm ownership structure and CSR. Keim (1978), Ullman

    8、n (1985), and Roberts (1992) all document a positive relationship between dispersed corporate ownership and CSR disclosure in the context of developed countries. Given the difference in peoples ethical reasoning and decisions between developed and 2 emerging countries (Ge and Thomas, 2007; Lam and S

    9、hi, 2008; Whitcomb et al., 1998), does ownership structure also affect CSR in emerging markets such as China? Do the factors that have been previously documented to drive CSR in Anglo-American countries (the USA and the UK) also determine CSR in emerging markets? In order to answer those questions,

    10、our study focuses on examining how a rms ownership structure and political interference affect CSR in the largest emerging market, namely, China.  Using Shanghai National Accounting Institutes (SNAI) Chinese rms social responsibility ranking, we show that for non-state-owned rms, corporate owne

    11、rship dispersion is positively associated to CSR. However, for state-owned rms, this relation is reversed. We attribute the reversed relationship to political interferences and further test this hypothesis by demonstrating that regional economic development is negatively related to CSR for state-own

    12、ed rms due to decreased political interference in more developed areas. The results also reveal that rms size, protability, employee power, leverage, and growth opportunity affect CSRs in China. This study contributes to the literature in several ways. First, this study directly examined the relatio

    13、nship between ownership structure and CSR in emerging markets, and our results depict that it is important to consider ownership type in assessing CSR in emerging market where state ownership is still prevalent, such as in China. Second, the high extent of retained government ownership in China allo

    14、ws us to investigate the link between CSR and ownership type using a unique data set provided by SNAI Chinese rms social responsibility ranking. Our ndings on the relationship between rm ownership type and CSR have implications in other countries where state-ownership is still prevalent, such as Sin

    15、gapore, Malaysia, Austria, and Finland (Claessens et al., 2000; Faccio and Lang, 2002). Third, we provide evidence of associations between CSR and rms size, protability, corporate governance, environmental pressures, and leverage. These ndings are consistent with those of prior research, which are m

    16、ostly documented in the developed-country context, suggesting that CSR activities are largely driven by strategic motivations and are constricted by economic considerations. Finally, while the issue of CSR has attracted 3 growing research interest in recent years, most empirical results are based on

    17、 the US data and this article is the rst empirical CSR research examining drivers of CSR in emerging markets to use a large research sample. In both Amato and Amato (2007) and Muller and Whiteman (2009), the corresponding authors advocate non-US-based studies of CSR to examine the effect of cultural

    18、, economic, legal, and ethical differences in corporate social performance. This article adds to a growing number of non-US studies by investigating the link between rms characteristics and CSR in China, the largest emerging market in the world.  The remainder of this study is organized as foll

    19、ows: The next section shows the relevant literature and identies our research questions. The third section provides an institutional background and develops hypotheses. The fourth section discusses data gathering and methodology. The fth section presents results, and the last section concludes, sugg

    20、esting implications of the study.   Literature review Prior research on CSR mainly focuses on conceptualizing as well as empirically assessing its impact on business performance. A number of studies have been conducted in an attempt to link CSR with nancial performance (i.e., Abratt and Sacks,

    21、1988; Aupperle et al., 1985; Russo and Fouts, 1997; Waddock and Graves, 1997). In addition to corporate performance, recent studies also examined the impact of CSR on other stakeholders of the companies. For example, Mohr et al. (2001) observe the impact of CSR on the customer buying behavior, while

    22、 Turban and Greening (1997) examine the impact of CSR on the organizational attractiveness to employees.  Compared with the growing body of literature on the nature and consequences of CSR, however, the issue of how to improve the companies level of CSR, or what factors determine CSR level, has received relatively limited attention, especially in the emerging market setting. Jones (1999) establishes that an institutional framework for the determinants of CSR, suggesting that institutional structure, such as sociocultural, national economy, industry, rm, and individual, mainly determines


    注意事项

    本文(外文翻译---企业社会责任,股权结构和政治干预:来自中国的证据)为本站会员(泛舟)主动上传,毕设资料网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请联系网站客服QQ:540560583,我们立即给予删除!




    关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们
    本站所有资料均属于原创者所有,仅提供参考和学习交流之用,请勿用做其他用途,转载必究!如有侵犯您的权利请联系本站,一经查实我们会立即删除相关内容!
    copyright@ 2008-2025 毕设资料网所有
    联系QQ:540560583